Optimizing the way energy is used in a data center goes far beyond improving the efficiency of backup generators. Generators fulfill a single mission-critical purpose: providing power during an outage. Their role is not continuous operation, and therefore their efficiency has a limited impact on the overall energy balance.
By contrast, Cogeneration (CHP) and Trigeneration (CCHP) can reshape the normal energy supply model when conditions allow, enabling on-site power generation and thermal energy recovery that can significantly improve the overall efficiency of the facility—not the efficiency of the generators themselves.
Although CHP and CCHP do not replace UPS or emergency generators, they can reduce dependence on the grid, lower operational costs, and enable circular energy strategies when a real, continuous thermal use is available.
This article examines how these models work, when they make sense, and what realistic benefits they can bring to data center operations.
From Energy Consumption to Energy Optimization
As data center electricity demand grows—driven by AI, cloud and high-density computing—energy availability and efficiency have become critical constraints. The focus is no longer only on reducing consumption, but on making better use of every unit of energy consumed.
A key opportunity lies in recovering energy that would otherwise be wasted.
However, it is essential to clarify two distinct sources of heat:
- The heat generated inside a data center (IT exhaust air) is low-grade and suitable for recovery only when paired with heat pumps that raise the temperature to usable levels. This heat recovery is generally a separate process from CHP/CCHP.
- In CHP/CCHP systems the recovered heat comes exclusively from the engine or turbine driving the generator—not from the IT load.
When external thermal demand is continuous, this recovered heat enables efficiency improvements for the fuel used that cannot be achieved through electric-only generation.
At the same time, grid constraints in many regions are forcing operators to evaluate on-site energy production as a complement to traditional electrical supply, especially when gas networks or alternative fuels are readily available.

Source: Shutterstock Explore
The Limits of Conventional Generators and Where CHP/CCHP Fit
Diesel generators remain a mandatory element in any Tier-compliant data center. They provide backup power, not continuous generation. Their efficiency is secondary to their reliability, and they are not expected to operate for long periods except in emergency scenarios.
CHP/CCHP systems do not improve the efficiency of backup generators and cannot replace them.
What they can do is:
- Act as a primary on-site power source during normal operation.
- Reduce grid imports.
- Generate useful thermal energy from the fuel consumed.
- Increase operational resilience through supply diversification.
- Thus, CHP/CCHP should be seen as complementary energy solutions that operate in parallel with, but never instead of, critical backup systems.
Cogeneration (CHP): On-Site Electricity + Useful Heat
How CHP works
A CHP system uses a single fuel source—commonly natural gas, biogas or synthetic fuels—to drive an engine or turbine that produces electricity. The waste heat from the engine block and exhaust gases is captured through heat exchangers.
This recovered heat can then be used for district heating, industrial processes, domestic hot water, or for upgrading through heat pumps.
CHP benefits when applied to data centers
CHP engines can operate with electrical efficiencies around 38–45%, but overall efficiencies can reach 80–90% when there is a real, continuous use for the recovered heat.
In the context of data centers, CHP can offer:
- On-site power generation, reducing dependence on the electrical grid.
- Lower operating costs when fuel prices and electricity market conditions are favorable.
- Lower emissions compared to separate electricity + heating production.
- Opportunities for integration with district heating networks, creating a circular energy model.
The feasibility depends entirely on the external thermal demand profile. Without it, CHP loses much of its value and the business case fails.
Trigeneration (CCHP): Adding Absorption-Based Cooling
How CCHP works
Trigeneration uses the waste heat from the CHP system to drive an absorption chiller, which produces chilled water. This cooling can supplement the data center’s mechanical cooling systems.

Source: Shutterstock Explore
CCHP benefits and realistic constraints
Using absorption cooling can reduce electrical consumption for cooling, particularly in climates or markets where electricity prices are high. It can also be valuable in hybrid district heating/cooling schemes.
However, several specific constraints apply:
- Absorption chillers do not replace the primary electric chillers and must not form part of the Tier-critical cooling path as their operation depends on a non-critical fuel source.
- Their operation depends entirely on the availability of continuous thermal energy from the CHP system.
- Their efficiency ($\text{COP} \sim 0.7$ for single-effect) means they are best used where thermal energy is abundant and inexpensive.
- When these conditions align, CCHP can reduce total energy costs and improve overall fuel-to-energy efficiency.
When Do CHP and CCHP Make Sense for Data Centers?
CHP/CCHP are not universal solutions. They are best suited for:
- Sites with limited grid capacity or long grid connection timelines.
- Locations with competitive gas prices or access to biogas/synthetic fuels.
- Data centers that can export heat or integrate into district heating networks.
- High-load facilities with predictable 24/7 energy demand.
- Operators seeking improved sustainability through combined heat and power cycles.
They are not suitable when:
- No viable thermal use exists (on-site or off-site).
- The operator requires full Tier IV isolation without operational dependency on fuel supply.
- Gas availability is constrained or subject to price volatility.
Conclusion: CHP and CCHP as Part of an Optimized Energy Strategy
CHP and CCHP systems can significantly improve the overall fuel-to-energy efficiency of a data center when they are applied in contexts where their technical and economic conditions make sense. They do not replace UPS, backup generators, or critical cooling systems, but they can complement the traditional data center architecture by:
- Reducing grid dependence through on-site generation.
- Increasing fuel-to-energy efficiency via heat recovery.
- Lowering operational costs under the right market conditions.
- Enabling circular models with district heating or supplemental cooling.
For data centers facing grid constraints, rising energy costs, or strong sustainability goals, these technologies offer a viable pathway to make better use of every unit of energy consumed—provided they are implemented where they are technically and economically justified.
Want to learn more about how to optimize data center power generation through advanced thermal engineering strategies such as cogeneration and trigeneration? Discover our data center reference ebook and data center cooling solutions, and get in touch with us to speak to our team about how we can help you.




